May 2008

international-fundsIf you are a U.S. investor, chances are you don’t have enough international funds in your portfolio.

I think you should hold at least 20 to 25 percent of your stock portfolio in international funds. In other words, I completely disagree with anyone who says that “a third of your stock stash seems a bit much. I’d say putting something on the order of 10 to 20 percent of your stock holdings in foreign stocks is enough.”

I hold about 25% of my portfolio in international funds and plan to gradually increase that number to 30%.

The main advantage to holding foreign stock is diversification: In 2007, mutual funds specializing in non-U.S. stocks returned 16%, while funds with diversified holdings in U.S. equities returned just over 6%.

The four basic rules of picking mutual funds:

1. Never buy into a mutual fund that has a front or a back load. Loads hurt a funds’ performance and cut into shareholders’ profits.

2. Always buy low-cost funds. Cheap index funds are a great investment tool, but I do own several actively managed funds. However, I only buy actively managed funds whose expense ratio is well below 1%. Higher expenses must be justified by spectacular performance, which is quite rare. If I hold the fund in a taxable account, I also look for a low turnover – no higher than 50% a year, and preferably closer to 20%.

3. When you buy an actively managed fund, it is a good idea to investigate the fund manager. Past performance generally doesn’t count, but if it is to count at all, it’s only when it belongs to the person who’s in charge now.

4. Full investment policy: look for cash reserves that are as low as possible – ideally, nearly 0%. Cash reserves hurt a fund’s performance.

International funds: my own five winning choices

Since these are all international funds, they obviously do not represent a complete, or a balanced, portfolio. With the exception of the Dodge & Cox fund, they are not core holdings. Some of them are risky and highly volatile. They did give me excellent results over the past few years, but you should keep in mind that I bought most of them during the 2000-2001 bear market, which might explain my good results.

However, I still hold all of them, and plan to keep doing so. I have also had plenty of losers in my portfolio over the years, but since the consensus seems to be that bloggers should post useful stuff, I will concentrate on the winners.

1. International fund: Dodge & Cox International Stock Fund DODFX – This fund has no load; expense ratio is 0.65%; annual turnover is 16%; cash reserves 2.1%; it boasts an impressive 5-year annualized total returns of 26%.

2.Japan Index Fund: iShares MSCI Japan Index EWJ Expense ratio is 0.52%. 5-year annualized total returns: 16.12%. According to Morningstar, “Investors seeking a straightforward Japan play will find iShares MSCI Japan Index a worthwhile option”. You should keep in mind that this ETF focuses on large cap stocks; that it will overlap with the Japan portions of any other foreign fund that you hold; and that the Japanese market is not always a friendly place to be.

3. China Portfolio: PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio. PGJ – Expense ratio for this ETF is 0.70%; 3-Year Annualized total returns are 29.46%. According to Morningstar, this ETF “warrants great caution”, which I completely agree with.

In fact, Morningstar analysts seem to dislike this ETF very much, despite its dirt-cheap cost compared with other Asia funds. But I like the low cost, the fact that it gives me good exposure to Chinese mid-cap companies, and the fact that it has been tax-efficient: it has not distributed any capital gains since its December 2004 launch. I handle the volatility by trimming it annually and making sure it remains just a small part of my portfolio.

4. European Stock Index: Vanguard European Stock Index VEURX. No Load. Expense ratio 0.22%. Turnover 9%, cash 0, 5-year annualized total returns 21%.

This mutual fund actually doesn’t provide much of a diversification against U.S. stocks, but I do like the companies in its portfolio. Recently, the dollar’s depreciation against European currencies boosted the value of the stocks in this portfolio, which is unhedged.

5. Emerging markets Fund: Vanguad Emerging Markets Vipers VWO. Expense ratio: 0.25%. 3-year annualized total returns: 33%. Annual turnover: 9%. Cash: 0.1%.

Despite the obvious risks, this fund gives me direct emerging-markets exposure at a very reasonable cost. Just like the China fund, I handle the volatility by trimming it annually.


Common sense caution: past performance really is not a good indicator of future results; I am not a financial adviser; these international funds have worked for me but may not work for you; please do your own research before investing.

Photo credit: thinkpanama

soda ad
Image credit: Joan Thewlis

Take a look at the text of this vintage ad for soda, supposedly sponsored by the Soda Pop Board of America:

“How soon is too soon? Not soon enough. Laboratory tests over the last few years have proven that babies who start drinking soda during that early formative period have a much higher chance of gaining acceptance and “fitting in” during those awkward pre-teen and teen years. So, do yourself a favor. Do your child a favor. Start them on a strict regimen of sodas and other sugary carbonated beverages right now, for a lifetime of guaranteed happiness.”

This image has been posted elsewhere before, but it HAS to be posted here too because it left me speechless, which rarely happens. My first thought was that this vintage ad is some kind of a joke, but after researching this on the Web, I am not so sure.

Do you happen to know if this was a real vintage ad? If the Soda Pop Board of America ever existed? It must be a joke, right?

Now look at this little gem:

coca-cola-adImage credit: retro contemoraneo

To judge by these vintage ads, it looks like the concept of “good parenting” has changed a lot over the past couple generations.

sexism

This lovely graffiti was forwarded to my Facebook account countless times. I deleted most of them. It’s one of several notorious Facebook chain letters and spam messages that just keep endlessly circulating in that contained little universe.

When a guy spams his entire friend list with a sexist message, I can take it as another proof that men are childish.

But when a woman hits forward, instead of deleting something like this right away, it makes me a little sad, and it also makes me wonder, what causes women to accept sexism as entertaining, or worth sharing, or even remotely acceptable.

A female friend told me yesterday that feminism apparently caused me to entirely lose my sense of humor. She thinks it’s a harmless, entertaining image and can’t see what’s so wrong with forwarding it.

I think it’s sexist, demeaning and offensive. I have yet to see a similar graffiti, portraying a man in a comparable position, being mass-forwarded to thousands of Facebook accounts.

What do you think? Have I lost my sense of humor? Is this social media sexism completely harmless?

Homeless A homeless man has stationed himself right next to the local Whole Foods store, where I do my weekly grocery shopping.

He has an ever-changing display of signs, where he explains how he got to be homeless and asks people for any kind of help – even a can of beans. When it gets sweltering hot, or very cold outside, he disappears, and I always wonder where he is and hope that he was able to find a warm, clean homeless shelter.

Sometimes it is really hard to step out of Whole Foods with my full cart and walk past him. He looks at me, and I feel guilty and ashamed, not because I am personally responsible for his situation, but because I am part of a society that allows homelessness and doesn’t fiercely guard the human dignity and human rights of its members.

Homelessness is a violation of fundamental human rights and freedoms, including the right to liberty and security of the person, the right to freedom from discrimination, the right to privacy, the right to health, and the right to an adequate standard of living.

Up until now, I have dealt with the guilt and shame by including Shelter Network in our family’s giving budget, and by offering “my” homeless man an occasional food item.

Today, I am also blogging about it, as part of the Bloggers Unite effort.

Photo credit: SamPac

Fashion in the fifties was extremely feminine, elegant, and… uncomfortable.

2162738340_22eaf8207d.jpg
Image credit:  Janno Joliat2007

I mean, can she BREATHE in that suit?

Probably not. She looks like she’s holding her breath.

Plus, that suit would explain the need for THIS lovely undergarment:

2049330919_6f61c54bcc_o.jpg
Image credit:  Janno Joliat2007

Aren’t you glad you’re not a fifties housewife?

When I was growing up, my mom used to tell me countless times, “Regardless of what you do, or what happens to you, I will always love you. There’s nothing you can do to make me stop loving you. Even if you mess up terribly, I will still be there for you.”

I will always be grateful to my mom for her unconditional love and for saying this. I didn’t mess up too badly. But those few little messes that did happen, proved that she meant what she said.

Since every other relationship I can think of (spouse, partner, friends, even children) CAN end if you mess up too much, it is comforting to know that there is one person out there that truly loves you unconditionally and will never stop loving you, no matter what.

In the photo: mother and I, January 1972. I am now 36 years old, which is almost ten years older than mom was when the photo was taken. Time flies!

Vintage Bras, Oh My

by MomGrind

These 1958 vintage bras look quite uncomfortable.

And POINTY:

vintage bras
Photo credit: sixtiesbooks

But hey, they’re cheap!

Actually, using a Consumer Price Index calculator, the relative dollar value for these vintage bras in today’s dollars would be $7, which means they really are cheap.