<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Warning Label for Retouched Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: May</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17314</link>
		<dc:creator>May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17314</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a fabulous idea! At the very least it&#039;s a start in the right direction and a legal option women can look to in order to help them deal with body issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a fabulous idea! At the very least it&#8217;s a start in the right direction and a legal option women can look to in order to help them deal with body issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daphne @ Joyful Days</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17231</link>
		<dc:creator>Daphne @ Joyful Days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17231</guid>
		<description>I think what would help is a law that the undoctored original should also be published somewhere in the same magazine, perhaps in a thumbsize version on the back cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what would help is a law that the undoctored original should also be published somewhere in the same magazine, perhaps in a thumbsize version on the back cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BunnygotBlog</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17227</link>
		<dc:creator>BunnygotBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17227</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

 I totally agree with the body image issue. I wrote about it myself. The last things young teenage girls need is airbrushed photos influencing their already difficult period of life.

Great article Vered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p> I totally agree with the body image issue. I wrote about it myself. The last things young teenage girls need is airbrushed photos influencing their already difficult period of life.</p>
<p>Great article Vered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MomGrind</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17226</link>
		<dc:creator>MomGrind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17226</guid>
		<description>Kim, what an interesting thought - retouching gadgets to make them look more appealing. I&#039;m sure they retouch to some extent - play with saturation etc. to make it look more appealing. Not the same as lengthening an actress legs, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, what an interesting thought &#8211; retouching gadgets to make them look more appealing. I&#8217;m sure they retouch to some extent &#8211; play with saturation etc. to make it look more appealing. Not the same as lengthening an actress legs, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele &#124; aka Raw Juice Girl</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17224</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele &#124; aka Raw Juice Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17224</guid>
		<description>I personally think they shouldn&#039;t mess with the photos at all. It&#039;s crazy to see someone on TV and then they&#039;re on a magazine cover and look HALF their real size. It&#039;s ridiculous! I think we should just appreciate whatever figure the models have (or don&#039;t have) and accept that people aren&#039;t &quot;perfect&quot; in any sense and we shouldn&#039;t strive to be stick thin. I think it would change young people&#039;s lives if they could read that disclaimer about the photos being retouched. It would be a breath of fresh air for them to know the people in the photos don&#039;t really look like that. And I believe it would help those will low self-esteem feel MUCH better about themselves. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think they shouldn&#8217;t mess with the photos at all. It&#8217;s crazy to see someone on TV and then they&#8217;re on a magazine cover and look HALF their real size. It&#8217;s ridiculous! I think we should just appreciate whatever figure the models have (or don&#8217;t have) and accept that people aren&#8217;t &#8220;perfect&#8221; in any sense and we shouldn&#8217;t strive to be stick thin. I think it would change young people&#8217;s lives if they could read that disclaimer about the photos being retouched. It would be a breath of fresh air for them to know the people in the photos don&#8217;t really look like that. And I believe it would help those will low self-esteem feel MUCH better about themselves. <img src='http://momgrind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tess  The Bold Life</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17223</link>
		<dc:creator>Tess  The Bold Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17223</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think education is enough. I believe everyone know this is going on and it&#039;s still effecting the self esteem of even adults. Yes I think it would be great ot put a little note under the photo saying, &quot;Airbrushed! View at your own risk. May cause low self esteem, eating disorders and debt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think education is enough. I believe everyone know this is going on and it&#8217;s still effecting the self esteem of even adults. Yes I think it would be great ot put a little note under the photo saying, &#8220;Airbrushed! View at your own risk. May cause low self esteem, eating disorders and debt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Woodbridge</title>
		<link>http://momgrind.com/2009/09/23/warning-label-retouched-photos/#comment-17213</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Woodbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momgrind.com/?p=3910#comment-17213</guid>
		<description>A disclaimer won&#039;t help.  We need to educate our children about this issue and simply not buy the magazines.  Now I wonder what they are doing to the photos of the gadgets in Wired to make the products more desirable ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A disclaimer won&#8217;t help.  We need to educate our children about this issue and simply not buy the magazines.  Now I wonder what they are doing to the photos of the gadgets in Wired to make the products more desirable <img src='http://momgrind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

